Friday, November 06, 2009

Spotlight Feature: Is It Finally Time to Cancel Leno?

By Frank Macek

After two months, NBC executives must be asking themselves whether its finally time to shelve "The Jay Leno Show."

The show's strong start in September has been followed by a dramatic drop off that has kept the network in 4th place during the fall and has seriously hurt affilates 11 PM newscasts across the country.

Nielsen ratings recently showed Cleveland as among Jay's most watched markets. Sad thing is, the ratings have wobbled between only a three and a five rating every week since the show's launch. We can only imagine how smaller markets must be faring.

NBC brass suggested early on that even a three rating would satisfy advertisers and make the network a ton of money in comparison to the amount they would have to pay for dramas or scripted shows in the 10 p.m. hour.

But is destroying the network worth it in the long run?

With NBC's arrogance the show would re-invent television, without considering "what if" the show failed, the network apparently never believed how such a failure would dampen affiliates news numbers at 11.

With all due respect to Jay and his staff, the show has not improved since its first week or two. In fact, the show has become very difficult to watch for a quarter hour, let alone a full 60 minutes. The skits are lame, the interviews are bland and the momentum seems lost in a show that seems the same night after night.

We highly doubt any network would stick with such a low rated show in its 10 p.m. hour for more than a week or two, let alone for 8 weeks.

With the recent news that NBC may be on the block by such suitors as Comcast, we wonder aloud whether a change in ownership could bring a quicker end to the show and a return to a traditional 10 p.m. hour of drama in some form.

Last week, Jay himself suggested he would be happy to return to the "Tonight Show," if NBC asked. This kind of statement makes us think Jay doesn't feel the show is working or knows something we don't going on behind the scenes.

In addition, Conan's numbers have slipped dramatically, giving the higher ground to David Letterman at 11:35 p.m. - not to mention how stiff Jimmy Fallon continues to look as host of "Late Night."

One idea we floated on the "Director's Cut Blog" not long ago was for NBC to consider allowing local affiliates the option of moving their newscasts to 10 p.m. weeknights as a compromise.

The network would push back Leno to 10:35 pm. and leave the rest of its late night schedule intact.

As of yet, we have not heard of any rumblings to this nature.

Perhaps the station in Boston who originally refused to air Leno was right after all.

---
Disclaimer: The thoughts and opinions expressed in this feature are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of WKYC or Gannett Broadcasting.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I think NBC should consider moving local news to 10 p.m. if the network still wants to stay out of the 10 p.m. one-hour race with CBS and ABC. WKYC will no doubt do well with local news at 10 p.m. given that the only current local news options in that time slot (WJW, WUAB) are not in the same format as WKYC. 3 would be a great alternative to those who are tired of edgier-driven newscasts, and for those who don't want to wait until 11 p.m. for news.

"Channel 3 News at 10" might not be such a bad idea if NBC decides to go in that direction. Romona could still serve as a solo anchor (BTW, she's doing a great as a solo anchor.), or Eric or Monica could join her with Betsy and Jim doing weather and sports respectively. It would be the 11 p.m. news an hour earlier.

NBC can then decide if Jay should be on at 10:30 p.m. or 11 p.m. and not to mention what to do about Conan, Fallon, and Carson Daly, who's not even mentioned at all in the late night battle. I'd say ditch "Last Call" (Carson's show), and just focus on Jay, Conan, and Fallon. Having one less talk show would be better for NBC.

Frank Macek said...

Thanks for the comments.. We'll see what happens.

Anonymous said...

Jay- although coming across as genuine, really has a tough time coming off as funny. In reality, he looks awkward.
True story; Years ago , I sent the show an email with a joke/idea that was used that very night by Jay in his monologue, just about verbatim.

I think I think Jay's strong suit was a great group of Tonight Show writers that he doesn't have access to anymore.

Anonymous said...

I have not watched a newscast since 23 news was taken off the air... The ten o'clock 23 news was such a good time since there isn't a real local newscast on at that time. I would watch a ten o'clock channel 3 news.

P.S. Eric should co-anchor any 10 o'clock operation that might come to be...

Eric Poston said...

LOVE LENO.

Do not get rid of him!

Anonymous said...

It's a struggle to watch the whole hour of Leno. I've only watched the whole show one time. Leno kept saying his show would be different than The Tonight Show. By that, I guess he meant not funny. Now I only watch when I'm waiting for the news. I'd rather have a real 1/2hr newscast on at 10. With the other newscasts on at 10, they just tease you to watch until 10:55pm and then it's much ado about nothing. If Channel 3 could push Leno to 10:35pm, I'd love that.

Anonymous said...

News at 10:00 would make sense. Leno is the best at what he does, at least he puts some effort into his craft, unlike David Letterman who hasn't has an original laugh since 1982. Also, WKYC news would see a ratings boost if it did 2-things 1) stop skewing so female 2) make Jim Donovan Romona's co-anchor.